640
+
the present time in respect of there
lets amounts to an
absent
the
part of Buddell to the withdrawal
of the notice of resumption by the
『༼,6,,.t.、,。。,『「
འ་
Mo
to the decision of Stuart V.C. cited above to the effect that
Man
after
notice to take his land could not
deal with such land?
19.
Ao
his now.
The octer point which has
been submitted to me is, that Riddell
would I think come to
ал
jury would
other conclusion than that the
rent and rates
vverel
providently
paid and did not amount to a
waiver
Taking
of a legal right, especially if were directed to adopt my
- opinion that neither the ore now the other could have been legally demanded. after the 26th of December last, even if they could after the date of the notice of resumption, which I inclined to doubt, having regard
casion,
sane
Three
years
former occa back after notice
on to him by the Government to resume possession of curtain other land after the price had been fixed asserted to the with- drawal of the notice by the Gavunment. If from this it is to be inferred that he has at present
standi
мо
locus
arist the Government
against
cannot acquiesce
in
I
амер
such pro-
doctrine
a
position for it would be
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.